I removed the following section from draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap:
<t>Sometimes, the client may know what AAA realm a particular
host should belong to. In this case it would be desirable to
use a name form that included a service, host and realm.
Syntactically, this appears the same as the domain-based name
discussed in <xref target="RFC5178"/>, but the semantics are
not similar enough semantics to use the same name form.</t>
Rationale: we describe the syntax for a name, but we don't actually give
the oid to use to import that name. We haven't needed such a name in
testing so far and you can always just import the gss-eap mechanism name
if you really need it. So it's needless complexity and if it turns out
it is needed later it can be added in a future document.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
