On 08/03/2012, at 7:10 AM, Sam Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> would we be OK with eap-aes128 meaning eap-aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96 and > eap-aes128-gcm meaning the obvious thing? I think this is a sensible compromise. _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
