Hi folks. I've submitted version of gss-eap-naming and gss-eap. To my knowledge the following open issues exist:
#32 (gss-eap): radius iana considerations are placeholders xx (not submitted gss-eap-naming): URN IANA considerations are a placeholder. I've bitten off somewhat more than I choose to chew in terms of IETF draft load. And I don't particularly like IANA considerations sections, and it shows from the above. However, I'd really love to see these last called. So, chairs permitting I'll submit new versions with the IANA considerations filled in correctly as soon as the draft window opens up. Now, I'd really appreciate reviews and people commenting on the changes. I think I've done the things we agreed at the last meeting and I'm quite happy with the overall quality of these drafts. I'd really like to thank Scott, Diego, Jim, Alexey, Josh, Alex, the chairs and anyone I've forgotten who has contributed. Your help has been important to getting where we are. I'm excited because I think we've made a lot of progress and I want to see us send some documents to the IESG. I realize we need to get done with the IANA considerations, chairs need to decide we're done, we need to last call before that can happen. However I'm happy that we are making significant steady progress! I'm also happy we're making significant progress on our external dependencies. Naming extensions is moving along in kitten and channel bindings is moving along in EMU. --Sam _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
