After reading Luke's mail and Ken's mail my preference is to chang ethe
draft to do what the Moonshot code does.  In particular I propose that
the channel binding code is critical but not required.  It MUSt be sent
when non-empty application channel bindings are passed in and MUST NOT
be sent when empty application channel bindings are passed into
gss_init_sec_context.

I'd appreciate someone besides me analyzing the protocol and confirming
that doing this is secure.

I think that leaves Luke, Ken and I preferring a change and no other
opinions expressed so far.

I'm holding we can fold a decision on this into a last call.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to