Hi. I think the review in kitten and krb-wg would be good. I think we already have a consensus that we want to register short SASL names; I will look into doing it like scram. Sorry for the sloppiness there.
It also looks like we left lifetimes as a todo. Whatever we do I think it should be a MAY or SHOULD implement, not a MUSt implement. It looks like on the acceptor we could support RADIUS session time limits (if there is such a thing). On the initiator there's not much we can do. Thanks for your review! _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
