In the various work in Kitten we specifically call out SAML 2.0. Although I hazard a guess that the likelihood of substantial incompatibility would be low, since you can't tell what will happen with a new version of ANYTHING, as a general rule it is best to be specific (IMHO).
Eliot On 6/30/12 9:02 PM, Jim Schaad wrote: > SAML 2.0 is the latest and best version of SAML. Is there/should there be a > restriction in the SAML document about using just SAML 2.0 and higher? If a > new version of SAML is produced, does there need to be a different set of > messages defined or should the current set of messages be sufficient > (assuming that the entire protocol world is not radically overhauled). > > Does any of this need to be put into the document? > > Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > abfab mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab > > _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
