-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/2012 09:31 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
>
> On 07/20/2012 07:20 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:
>>
>>> 9. 3.9 seems quite far-fetched to me. Do you really expect
>>> sensors to use gss-eap?
>>
>> I've seen a couple of examples of sensor nets built using wifi
>> hardware - sensors don't have to be small "toaster-like"
>> objects.
>
> Sure. I've built a number networks with nodes like that myself,
> (e.g. [1] :-) Never needed nor considered anything like abfab. Ours
> are v. small networks of course, but I've also never heard anyone
> ask for what 3.9 is selling.
>
> But like I said, its a comment that the wg can take or leave,
> before or during IETF LC.
>
> S.
>
> [1]
> http://extremecom2012.ee.ethz.ch/papers/6-extremecom2012-Arkko.pdf
Good - I misunderstood your comment as saying something else! All good.
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlAJu+cACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZndDgwCfcX7kXlFeucnWXH25Hx8ymXiH
Gx0AnjXSiazWFgRDaLMRN/7kvfxGwsHv
=75eH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
