That would make sense to me. And I am already trying to get as many of the overall items as possible into that document.
Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Sam Hartman > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:49 AM > To: Stephen Farrell > Cc: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [abfab] Fwd: Secdir review of draft-ietf-abfab-usecases-03 > > I wonder whether addressing the higher-level security issues in abfab-arch > makes more sense. > It seems like the consideractions are architecture not use-case specific. > _______________________________________________ > abfab mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
