OK, I'm with Josh.  This is going to be one of those cases where digging
in heals now and saying MUST NOT sign will save us political grief
later.  A lot of people like Stephen are going to look at ignore
signatures and complain, where as they would be more willing to accept
that we're simply not using per-message signatures at all.  It's
unfortunate because I do think there ar situations where signatures are
valuable.  However, I'm imagining that we're going to be having this
argument again and again and again and it just won't be worth the cost.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to