>>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Winter <[email protected]> writes:
Stefan> Hi,
>> I'd like to have fairly clear text that this is an application
>> decision and that EAP and AAA are not trying to define the extent
>> of a session or lifetime for applications. Other people involved
>> in the PCP discussion may disagree with me and prefer that
>> EAP/AAA define this for apps.
Stefan> It sounds to me like the sequence of events here should
Stefan> better be: you and the other people in PCP come to an
Stefan> agreement which of the two approaches should be taken and
Stefan> *then* one has to think whether a corresponding update to
Stefan> either section 1.3 or any other part of RFC3748 is
Stefan> necessary.
I'm confused by your message because I don't understand how PCP can make
the decision without understanding the EAP requirements.
If EAP is going to make requirements of PCP, then either PCP needs to
meet those requirements or not use EAP.
so, I think we need to understand the general requirements to understand
what our options are in PCP.
So, would you be willing to explain why you believe PCP should decide on
its requirements first and how you see that interacting with a later
general discussion?
--Sam
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
