Josh, I see it as
<element name="SubjectQuery" type="samlp:SubjectQueryAbstractType"/> <complexType name="SubjectQueryAbstractType" abstract="true"> <complexContent> <extension base="samlp:RequestAbstractType"> <sequence> <element ref="saml:Subject"/> </sequence> </extension> </complexContent> </complexType> Which does not have an optional on the subject Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Howlett [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 7:19 AM > To: Jim Schaad; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [abfab] SAML draft and naming issues > > Jim, > > >I really don't like the fact that the current draft says that the > >subject field is omitted when constructing a request. > >1. It means that I cannot use my existing validating parser for this > >as we will no longer have schema compliant XML for the request. > >2. See #1 > > This surprises me. The relevant bit of the schema is: > > <element ref="saml:Subject" minOccurs="0"/> > > > What specifically is your parser saying? > > (I'll address the rest of your email when I return from holiday). > > Josh. > > > > Janet is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited by > guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose > Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, > Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG _______________________________________________ abfab mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
