[email protected] wrote:
> I suggest to investigate all corner cases before making a decision on a
> particular mechanism.  The corner cases are:
>
> (a)    Client supports fragmentation and server does not support
> fragmentation

  This is possible.

> (a-1) Access-Request is fragmented
> (a-2) Access-Challenge is fragmented 
> (a-3) Access-Accept is fragmented

  These scenarios are not possible.

  The draft talks about fragmenting *data*.  The various packet types
are transports used to carry data.  Saying that an "Access-Request is
fragmented" is meaningless.  Packets aren't fragmented.

  If a client wants to send large amounts of data to the server, it
needs to use Access-Requests to do so.  It will signal support for
fragmentation, as Alejandro said.  The server will either ack that (via
an attribute in a packet), or will ignore it.

  Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to