folks, the radext chairs have decided there is not currently rough
consensus to adopt the fragmentation draft.
We should track this closely.
--- Begin Message ---
Folks,
It seems the document as such still needs more work to be
acceptable as a WG item. We will have time for a discussion
around the fragmentation in Orlando meeting agenda and see
then where to head to.
Related to this, we will also have a presentation of the
other alternative proposals seen on the list.
- Jouni & Mauricio
On Feb 22, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Alejandro Perez Mendez <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I support adopting the previous version of this draft
>> (draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation-04) and would support adopting
>> the current version (draft-perez-radext-radius-fragmentation-05) if a
>> mechanism was added for fragmented information in access-request prior
>> to authentication. That is, I disagree with one of the changes the
>> authors made between 04 and 05.
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> we have been discussing this aspect internally, and we have concluded that
> the support of fragmentation prior to authentication will be re-incorporated
> into the next version of the document, though it will be noted that it may
> have the potential to allow DoS attacks.
>
> Best regards,
> Alejandro
>
>
>>
>> --Sam
>> _______________________________________________
>> radext mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
>
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
_______________________________________________
radext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab
