On 11/07/2013 07:24 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> On 11/7/13, 1:10 PM, "Sam Hartman" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> OK.
>> So, we're telling people that they should confirm  that the realm
>> portion of the NAI is in the response or metadata for the IDP, but we
>> have no way to express that name in either interoperably?
>>
>> That's possibly OK, but might need to be called out.
> Or define something, yes. There are reasons to think something's going to
> be needed. Realm-based discovery seems likely to be the path forward in
> other areas.
>
>
I would't be surprised to see people asking to overloading Scope for
this as it gets deployed.
_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to