On 11/11/2013 06:48 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> I reviewed the section 5 text that talks about the naming issue, so here's
> my opinion based on that reading.
>
> TL;DR, don't waste time overloading something already there, just define
> what you need.
>
>
> While I think there might be some tactical ways to do this on the SP side
> along the lines of what I said in the Jabber room last Thursday, I think
> ultimately you have a parallel problem on both ends that probably just
> needs to be solved consistently.
>
> In both cases, you have an entityID you're trying to evaluate in the
> context of a realm, so I think you just need to define a metadata
> extension to do that.
>
> As we've discussed, yes this looks like Scope, and in many cases it will
> be the same value, but that doesn't mean it's the same thing. That also
> doesn't address the SP end.
>
> There are two obvious choices here:
>
> - an explicit extension element
> - an entity attribute
>
> I'm completely ambivalent about which you use. Specifying an entity
> attribute is less work, but the XML is slightly more verbose in the end.
> An advantage that is unlikely to be all that important but YMMV is that
> defining a SAML Attribute for this allows the concept of the realm to be
> expressed in other contexts in SAML, and using the EntityAttributes
> extension means you can (but I doubt you would) actually embed a third
> party attestation to the realm information in the form of an actual SAML
> Assertion inside the metadata.
>
> On the subject of whether you should/need to do this now, I think there
> are other use cases for getting what amounts to a AAA "realm" mapped in
> metadata. We should just do it.
As an individual I'm all for an entity attribute. That also gives us the
impetus to finalize the entity category draft (http://macedir.org)
> -- Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> abfab mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to