Hi Sam,

> As I understand it, in the case where we're not using SAML metadata, and
> where we're relying on the AA trust fabric, we make the requirement that the
> AAA entities correspond to the SAML entities.
> So, we don't need to constrain the SAML naming because  the AAA entities
> are making the assertions that the SAML names also correspond to the AAA
> names.

Yes, but I believe that we also need to constrain SAML naming to the extent 
that SAML entities are making claims about their names to other entities in a 
way that is consistent with the underlying AAA system.

For example, in a model where AAA trust is assumed sufficient, a relying party 
could consume the same SAML name from two entities. This isn't a problem if a 
relying party is just interested in consuming the rest of the assertion 
(attributes, etc.) that relate to an authenticated principal but, for example, 
it would impede a subsequent SAML exchange where all the requestor has is a 
SAML name for an entity whose semantics say nothing about how to reach it using 
AAA.
 
> In the case where we're trusting SAML metadata or policy, the issue is that
> we need to avoid a cut&paste attack where a SAML message intended for
> one party is intended for another party.  The issue we are trying to solve is
> how to indicate in SAML messages or metadata that a particular AAA
> endpoint was a valid destination for a binding or entity.

Ah yes, the slides were not explicit about this, sorry. The assertion would be 
scoped to an <Audience> (the valid destination) using the proposed format, 
signed by the issuer, and use a standard SAML entity identifier to identify 
itself. The recipient, having validated the signature against the metadata, 
could validate itself as the intended <Audience>.

Josh.


Janet(UK) is a trading name of Jisc Collections and Janet Limited, a 
not-for-profit company which is registered in England under No. 2881024 
and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue,
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG. VAT No. 614944238

_______________________________________________
abfab mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab

Reply via email to