On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Eric W. Sink wrote: > Some of the stuff above is my opinion. Some of it is the opinion our > target market will have. For example, personally, I rather like Perl, > but its syntax is patently absurd for a target market which includes > people like my Dad, or people like the VB crowd. >From my experience with Word, only programmatically inclined people tend to use scripting anyway. At some point it can either be easy, or useful, but not both. I'd say err on the side of usefulness. My vote would be for perl or maybe Python (haven't tried it yet but I keep hearing good things). What should this scripting do? If it needs to be able to open dialogues like V/WordBasic it will need to work well with GTK+ (there are perl and Python bindings, anyone try them?). Matthew Dockrey Master Control Program sez: http://weber.u.washington.edu/~gfish END OF LINE
- Our first potential flame war: which scripting languag... Eric W. Sink
- Re: Our first potential flame war: which scripting... William Aoki
- Re: Our first potential flame war: which scrip... Eric W. Sink
- Re: Our first potential flame war: which s... Sean Grimes
- RE: Our first potential flame war: which scriptin... amphigory
- RE: Our first potential flame war: which scri... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: Our first potential flame war: which scriptin... M. Dockrey
- Re: Our first potential flame war: which scriptin... Leonard Rosenthol
- RE: Our first potential flame war: which scriptin... Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: Our first potential flame war: which scriptin... Clive Bittlestone
- Our first potential flame war: which scripting la... Phil Beauchamp
- Re: Our first potential flame war: which scri... Eric W. Sink
- Re: Our first potential flame war: which scri... Andrew M. Kuchling
- Re: Our first potential flame war: which scriptin... Norman Lorrain
