-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 22 May 2000, Martin Sevior wrote:

> HI Sam,
>       Sorry I lost your original email. I think it would be great for
> abi to support as many formats as possible. Unfortunately I cannot test
> your patch because I know nothing about xhtml. However I recall some
> arguments Paul Rohr made about importing html and I wonder how you would
> respond to them.
> 
> 1. A full html import would require a code base of approximately the
> complexity of mozzilla. We don't want to go there.

Right.  There are a number of factors that make this a 600 line file,
instead of 60 megs.  

1- AbiWord does all the redering for me.
2- Expat does all the parsing for me (and I only accept well-formed XHTML)
3- I just ignore lots of tags

> 
> 2. Should we advertise ourselves as having xhtml import when we we can
> only support a tiny subset of the available documents? In the case of
> other Word Processors we aim to eventually be a superset of them all so I
> have no problem starting with a useful subset.
> 

I would not reccommend putting my current importer in a release version.
(It won't support bold and italic together, for example) However, it
should accept any well-formed XHTML document.  
(actually, it accepts any wellformed document beginning with
<html>...<body>)

> 3. What do you currently do for things like tables, lists, math formulae
> and the like? Do you try to extract what infor you can even though we
> can't properly display it?
> 

Math formulae are not expressible in XHTML currently (unless you use
images).  As for tables and lists, I just rip the text out (which is
really easy - see my XML importer).

> 4. Is this the start of a kword import filter? If so see 3.
> 

Yeah, that's next on the list.  It would be even more useful than XHTML,
but I understand XHTML better (I don't even have KWord).  

> Cheers
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

           
                                sam th               
                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                http://sam.rh.uchicago.edu                             
         
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE5KUD7t+kM0Mq9M/wRAhYTAKCS+xH3O6cHiY+am6EsWcME1e+WMQCdHO18
UflxXXAEbB66O9DiIj+3QE8=
=3yHm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply via email to