At 02:49 PM 5/31/00 -0500, sam th wrote: >As an additional concern, if we were to do this major conversion, what >would that do to any timeframe people might have. Does sourcegear want to >release abiword in the near future? Would this rewrite hinder that? Yes. SourceGear would really like to move this project toward a 1.0 release in a big way. If someone wants to work on rewriting the piece table, we won't stop you. From my point of view though, it would be significantly more useful to work on the list patch, the Word export work that has been started, or one of the 200 outstanding bugs. Robert Sievers Open Source Evangelist
- A Proposal (why we should have setBold(true)) sam th
- Re: A Proposal (why we should have setBold(true)) Martin Sevior
- Re: A Proposal (why we should have setBold(true)) Eric W. Sink
- Re: A Proposal (why we should have setBold(true)) sam th
- Re: A Proposal (why we should have setBold(true)) Robert Sievers
- Re: A Proposal (why we should have setBold(true... sam th
- Re: A Proposal (why we should have setBold(... Martin Sevior
- Re: A Proposal (why we should have setB... Eric W. Sink
- Re: A Proposal (why we should have... Martin Sevior
- Modeless Dialogs (was Re: A Propos... sam th
- Re: Modeless Dialogs (was Re: ... Eric W. Sink
- RE: A Proposal (why we should have setB... James Montgomerie
- Re: A Proposal (why we should have setBold(true... Paul Rohr
