--- Goran Thyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > > > > At 8:46 AM +0200 7/26/00, Goran Thyni wrote: > > >In the longer run it would be preferable not to > convert > > >SVG to PNG since you then look the resolution and > the > > >image is not scalable, ie you can no change the > size of > > >the image (with good results) unless you remove > the image > > >and reinsert it with a diffent size. > > > > We convert it to PNG for display (wrap > handling, etc.), but > > the original SVG is maintained in memory so that > it can be used when > > necessary, such as for rerendering on size/zoom > changes, scrap > > exchange, integration with other tools, etc. > > Smart, it does what I outlined by automation. :-) > Using gill would still save memory and CPU cycles > since > we reduce the number of image buffer from 3 to 2. > (SVG image [-> PNG image] -> displayable bitmap) > or am I missing something. There are many good reasons to use Bonobo, but seriously, "performance" is not one of them. Reusability is the key here, not performance. Cheers, ===== Joaquin Cuenca Abela e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/
