The tree is fixed.
And, the justification code looks quite nice. It leaves white gaps
when drawing the selections, but there are worse problems. :-)
--
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 05:16:27PM +0100, Caolan McNamara wrote:
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
> by postman.sourcegear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA13916
> for abiword-dev-outgoing; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:50:34 -0500
> Received: (from andy@localhost)
> by postman.sourcegear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA13910
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 12:50:34 -0500
> Received: from mailgate2.ul.ie (mailgate2.ul.ie [136.201.1.2])
> by postman.sourcegear.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA11936
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 11:55:33 -0500
> Received: from exch-staff1.ul.ie by mailgate2.ul.ie with SMTP (PP)
> id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 17:22:52 +0000
> Received: from metasyntax.idc.ul.ie ([136.201.107.65]) by exch-staff1.ul.ie
> with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0)
> id 4JT9H77X; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 17:14:00 +0100
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1 [p0] on Linux
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 17:16:27 +0100 (IST)
> Organization: Interactive Design Center
> From: Caolan McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Eric W. Sink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: The tree seems hosed...
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Precedence: bulk
> Status:
>
>
> On 08-Oct-99 Eric W. Sink wrote:
> >I was eager to see the full justification code in action, but alas, it
> >does not build for me. Is anyone else getting this problem? (Given
> >the nature of the error below, I suspect it will break on almost any
> >C++ compiler, but I *do* tend to update my Debian potato system quite
> >often, so I never like to rule out the possibility that I got an
> >unstable set of tools.)
> >
> >Anyway, here's the error:
> >
> >ie_imp_MsWord_97.cpp:
> >
> >ie_imp_MsWord_97.cpp:99: passing `int (*)(wvParseStruct *, wvTag, void *)' as
> >argument 1 of `wvSetElementHandler(int (*)(wvParseStruct *, wvTag, void *,
> >int))'
> >
>
> Hmm, sorry about this, my mail warnings about the change appears to be about 4
> hours slow to leave the building, while my cvs updates are immediate. By the
> time you get *this* im sure it obvious what the error is, add another int
> argument to the end of the ElementHandler, this is the change as discussed
> previously to flag that PAP or CHP is exactly the same as the style it is
> based upon.
>
> C.
>
> >--
> >Eric W. Sink, Software Craftsman
> >SourceGear Corporation
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Real Life: Caolan McNamara * Doing: MSc in HCI
> Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Phone: +353-86-8790257
> URL: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~caolan * Sig: an oblique strategy
> Lost in useless territory
--
Eric W. Sink, Software Craftsman
SourceGear Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
