On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:24:30 sam th wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote: > > Yes, they are clearly all very different from a functional language. And > even more different from LISP dialects. But on each of your points, the > similariteis you mention are not that significant. > > Flow-control - you could easily (well, maybe not easily) use recursion for > all your c loops. > > Basic math - this is just a lisp thing. Haskell, for example, uses infix > for math. > > statement/expression, rval, lval - all of these are present in scheme also > for example, the following is illegal > > (define (+ 2 3) (+ 4 5)) While we're talking about functional languages, how about ML? Or have I been studying in Edinburgh for too long...? :-) Jamie
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Big Ed
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone sam th
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Aaron Lehmann
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic C... sam th
- Re: Scripting with Visual Bas... Mike Meyer
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone sam th
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Tomasz Wegrzanowski
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic C... sam th
- Re: Scripting with Visual Bas... James Montgomerie
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone sam th
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Tomasz Wegrzanowski
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic C... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Ash
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Big Ed
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Tomasz Wegrzanowski
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Juan Carlos Castro y Castro
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Big Ed
- Re: Scripting with Visual Basic Clone Ash
