-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Micha�l Wong writes:
> > In my opinion, you guys should try to go to version 1.0 of Abiword before
> > arguing about what language to use.
>
> In my opinion, we shouldn't be arguing about what language to use, we
> should choose a technology that lets us use many languages.
This would certainly be nice. I don't think we should try to cut off
discussion of this topic (as Bob suggested), althought implementation now
would be *very* premature. All these messages do suggest that some of us
(myself included) are not spending enough time fixing real problems.
>
> > Who are the users of abiword? Mostly secretaries of programmers?
> > If secretaries, than some kind of simple language, like basic. If
> > programmers, than something like java or another C++ derived language.
> > After all, you all are C++ programmers here, aren't you?
>
> Nope. C++ combines the worst features of C and OO programming. I fix
> bugs in other people's C++ programs, but don't write it if I can avoid
> it.
Please. Scripting language debates are one thing, but we already have
chosen C++, and don't need a flamewar about it.
sam th
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5XR5mt+kM0Mq9M/wRAjNMAJ9F0BS6F3JNcORZkil2a974IxPADgCgkJif
tDs1qpXclHUGIrJDZRPK+g4=
=LFYf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
