At 08:35 AM 1/18/00 -0500, Larry Kollar wrote: >> ESR thinks we should have more documentation on the site, and >> frankly, i agree with him. at a minimum, the contents of abi/docs >> should be availible online. > >I would think they should be available in both PostScript and HTML >formats. Converting to HTML should be simple enough; if nobody else >has stepped up by next week, somebody remind me and I'll see what I >can do. I've been banging on a Perl script at work to convert an SGML >file to a bunch of HTML files, so I have some core code that can be >put to use immediately. (I've also been tagged to preach at church this >Sunday, so the rest of the week is shot for me.) Hmmm, now that I >think about it, non-styled Abi files are going to make for UGLY HTML >unless the script has some intelligence. Oh well. If you had such a beast, I would take care of updating the web site now and as these documents change. I could always do it manually, which I was considering doing, but I am pretty crushed for time right now on other abi related tasks. It's really up to you. Every little bit helps, and as for the UGLY HTML, I know PERL and may be able to help refine the script once you get the foundations in place. Robert Sievers Open Source Evangelist
