-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 8 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> sam th wrote:
> > > On Intel, we also get lot of warnings.
> > I've done some work cleaning up the Linux warnings, and almost all of them
> > are warnings about unused variables that are actullay used in UT_ASSERT
> > code. Other than that, there are only a few warnings.  
> 
> We've also got to remember the Makefiles use flags "-g -Wall -W", which turn
> on _every_single_warning_ GCC knows.  If people really hate warnings, we can
> tune the Makefiles to just throw the ones that matter.
> 
> -- 
> Shaw Terwilliger
> 
If we could find a way to eliminate just the unused variable warnings
(which shouldn't be the sign of a serious problem, and is almost alway
bogus) it would make finding the legitamate warnings much easier.
           
                                sam th               
                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                        
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE4oEX4t+kM0Mq9M/wRAmZGAKDBSu7FDibE5fau/bf8gWol51Pf0wCeKZbh
1FRP9H0l9DhtBDUw1uWYiOQ=
=FRyc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply via email to