Martin Sevior wrote: > understand, every font was declared as a Latin1. Why? The macro "LAT" does > this. I removed it and I see no difference in the quality of regular fonts > but now "symbol" and "dingbat" fonts are printed. The fonts need to be declared Latin 1, or non-ASCII Latin-1 characters will be mapped wrong into these fonts. That "symbol" and "dingbat" fonts now print (but in character ranges for normal ASCII Latin-1 set glyphs) is a bug. They should not print, since their character encodings should be different. To see the difference, insert some accented characters into your document (Latin-1 grave, acute, etc.) and print. You'll get the wrong characters unless the PostScript assumes a Latin-1 mapping for its fonts. -- Shaw Terwilliger
