Robert Sievers wrote: > At 10:49 PM 11/7/99 -0700, Logan Hall wrote: > >i have been playing with the style commands on the latest cvs build and > >the problem i reported as bug 620 seems to have dissapeared. This > >should be marked as qa to verify fixed. I would do it but im not sure > >if that would be right and propper of me. also i dont know if i can > >even do that in bugzilla > > Yes, you (or anyone) are encoouraged to move a bug to the "QA to Verify" > status if you think it should be closed. All I ask is that a brief note is > written when you do. Just do not take the next step and move the bug from > "QA to Verify" to "Closed", or else I won't have the chance to do > regression testing. > > Robert Sievers > Open Source Evangelist Ok... i added a note to the end of the bug report. Thanks for the info.
