Yes, I kept the same semantics:

_emit_setFont()
{
        _emit_setFont(currentFont);
        [removed code to set font]
}

_emit_setFont(Font font)
{
        [ps code to set font]
}

My problem was mainly with 1) code duplication and 2) the "CJK" tacked onto 
the function name when it was actually generic code that had nothing to do 
with CJK fonts. For example, I couldn't imagine some guy who implements 
Hebrew or Arabic next year would know to call emit_setFontCJK(). It wasn't 
anything serious and certanly wasn't anything to feel "stupid" about. I'm 
sorry if I sounded that way. I didn't mean to.

Apologies,
Dom
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




Reply via email to