This was just a thought; I have not done any profiling. My logic was that (1) wordprocessing is intensive on str operations; (2) at least on the x86 processor basic str operations can be done very efficiently in assembler because of the dedicated str instructions. I am aware of the x-platform issues, though. Tomas > What has led you to this conclusion? I'm just curious > to know what profiling you have done to look at the usage > count and time spent on the string operations to determine > that they are a bottleneck in the system. > > Thomas (boy this could get confusing) >
- drawing performance Tomas Frydrych
- Re: drawing performance Sam TH
- Re: drawing performance Aaron Lehmann
- Re: drawing performance Thomas Fletcher
- General performance [was: drawing performance] Tomas Frydrych
- General performance [was: drawing performance] Mike Nordell
- Re: General performance [was: drawing performance... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: General performance [was: drawing performance... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: General performance [was: drawing perform... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: General performance [was: drawing per... Mike Nordell
- Re: General performance [was: drawing per... Martin Sevior
- Re: General performance [was: drawin... WJCarpenter
- Re: General performance [was: drawin... Sam TH
