This was just a thought; I have not done any profiling. My logic was 
that (1) wordprocessing is intensive on str operations; (2) at least 
on the x86 processor basic str operations can be done very 
efficiently in assembler because of the dedicated str instructions.

I am aware of the x-platform issues, though.

Tomas

>   What has led you to this conclusion?  I'm just curious
> to know what profiling you have done to look at the usage
> count and time spent on the string operations to determine
> that they are a bottleneck in the system.
> 
> Thomas (boy this could get confusing)
> 



Reply via email to