Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>> If so,
>> what warning level is used for that compile?
>
>-Wall. No warnings were produced compiling the files that
> apparently broke the windows build.
Then it seems to me that gcc have a bug in the handling of global const
objects.
> Is extern const illegal?
AFAIK, no, why I was surprised that gcc didn't handle my original changes.
But it was an obvious error that the mentioned variables were declared const
but defined non-const, which was what I fixed to make win32 build again,
declaring them non-const.
/Mike
