Committed with a little addition to get rid of an annoying assert when
advancing one line.


CVS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CVS: Enter Log.  Lines beginning with `CVS:' are removed automatically
CVS: 
CVS: Committing in .
CVS: 
CVS: Modified Files:
CVS:    src/text/fmt/xp/fl_AutoNum.cpp src/text/fmt/xp/fl_AutoNum.h 
CVS:    src/text/fmt/xp/fl_BlockLayout.cpp 
CVS:    src/text/fmt/xp/fl_BlockLayout.h 
CVS:    src/text/fmt/xp/fl_DocLayout.cpp 
CVS:    src/text/fmt/xp/fl_DocLayout.h src/text/fmt/xp/fl_Layout.cpp 
CVS:    src/text/fmt/xp/fl_Layout.h src/text/fmt/xp/fv_View.cpp 
CVS:    src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_Document.cpp 
CVS:    src/text/ptbl/xp/pd_Document.h 
CVS:    src/text/ptbl/xp/pt_PT_Styles.cpp src/text/ptbl/xp/pt_Types.h 
CVS:    src/wp/ap/xp/ap_Dialog_Lists.cpp 
CVS:    src/wp/impexp/xp/ie_exp_AbiWord_1.cpp 
CVS:    src/wp/impexp/xp/ie_imp_AbiWord_1.cpp 
CVS:    src/wp/impexp/xp/ie_imp_AbiWord_1.h 
CVS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Improved Lists backend from Luke Jordan. This is not the end of Lists but 
it is another big step. We have a major bug in restoring multi-level
lists.
 



On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Luke Jordan wrote:

> Hi,
> This substantially improves our current list implementation. We now
> explicitly export lists and their properties, list-delimiters work, and
> quite a few bugs have been fixed. 
> We do, though have a rather bizarre bug. Upon loading a saved document
> with multi-level lists, e.g.
> 1. 
> 2.
> 2.1
> 3.
> we get:
> 2.1
> 3.
> 1.
> 2.
> Martin's found that the blocks remain in the correct order in the piece
> table, and are re-exported correctly. Further, if the first sub-list
> block occurs in position 2, i.e.
> 1.
> 1.1.
> This loads correctly. We believe this to be a problem in one of
> fl_DocLayout/fl_SectionLayout or fp_Page, but have so far found nothing.
> We'd appreciate any help on this.
> Besides that, I believe we have a pretty good lists implementation
> going, and one that will be even better when the revised fields are
> done. Oh, and to anybody working on porting the lists dialog, don't
> worry, the only changes to that are minimal and all XP.
> Thanks,
> Luke.




Reply via email to