This has been commented out and committed. Dom >From: Thomas Fletcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Martin Sevior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Nordell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >AbiWord-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: ANOTHER Spurious assert? >Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 17:08:06 -0500 > > > >On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Martin Sevior wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, Sam TH wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 03:43:15PM +0100, Mike Nordell wrote: > > > > pf_Frag_Object constructor asserts > > > > > > > > UT_ASSERT(pszType); > > > > > > > > Is this really correct? An image don't have a "type". To reproduce, >try > > > > opening test/wp/suite/image_height_width.abw > > > > > > Yeah, that assert seems bogus. It can go. > > > > > It was probabally left over from debugging the piecetable fields patch. > > Feel free to remove it. > > > >Martin, > > While we are at it (talking about spurious asserts), Martin you >put one in just recently to assert fv_View.cpp line 1093 > >UT_Bool FV_View::cmdCharInsert(UT_UCSChar * text, > UT_uint32 count, UT_Bool bForce) > >[ ... ] > >1.305 (msevior 08-Nov-00): UT_uint32 d = (UT_uint32) text[0]; >1.305 (msevior 08-Nov-00): UT_ASSERT( d != 63); > > >This is asserting every time I type in a '?', which is really >annoying let me tell you. > >Won't show up in the real builds, but I prefer to work on the >debug versions so that when bad things happen I can try and >fix them. > >Thomas > > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
