Saint-Denis wrote:
> The patch I am proposing is making some ground for Win9x. It now support
> usuals, unicode and symbol fonts. Symbol fonts are detected automaticaly.
> Characters widths are evaluated correctly.

I had a quick look at your proposed patch, and though I haven't actually
tried it yet I think it's the best solution so far.

The only reservation I have is the use of the static member function as a C
callback. For more information, see:
<http://anubis.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_closed.html#168>.

/Mike


Reply via email to