At 12:04 AM +0400 1/31/01, Vlad Harchev wrote:
>  I think that XP PS export is not worth the efforts

        As the person who originally suggested it, it IS worth the
effort if you look at it as a bridge to "smart PDF documents".  By
generating our own Postscript (on ANY platform) we can incorporate
PDFMarks - PS extensions that allow one to specify PDF features to
Distiller/Ghostscript.


>  Also, it still would be nice to make AW full supporting TTFs (even with
>non-unicode ttf fonts).
>
        Agreed.   I believe the latest version of pdfTeX now supports
TTFs and properly writing them out to PS and PDF, so that's probably
a good place to look.


Leonard
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   You've got a SmartFriend� in Pennsylvania
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonard Rosenthol                       Internet:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                        America Online: MACgician
Web Site: <http://www.lazerware.com/>
FTP Site: <ftp://ftp.lazerware.com/>
PGP Fingerprint: C76E 0497 C459 182D 0C6B  AB6B CA10 B4DF 8067 5E65


Reply via email to