On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 11:52:41PM +0100, Frodo Looijaard wrote: > Why do we try to support both expat and libxml2? I choose libxml2 > myself because I have it in shared form, on the theory that this > will cut down on the size of the AbiWord image. But, unless there > is a good reason why we support both (do they not run on all > platforms?) I think we should resolve which one we want to use. Why do we support all these legacy platforms? We _could_ just use GTK as a primary frontend on all of the platforms. That would not make the application better...
- PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was broken Frodo Looijaard
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was broken Frodo Looijaard
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was broken Sam TH
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was bro... Thomas Fletcher
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was... Aaron Lehmann
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML... Thomas Fletcher
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was... Martin Sevior
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML... Frodo Looijaard
- Win32 XML parser [was: PATCH: ... LIBXML2 w... Mike Nordell
- Re: Win32 XML parser [was: PATCH: ... L... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was broken Aaron Lehmann
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was bro... Mike Nordell
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was bro... Thomas Fletcher
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was... Sam TH
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML... Vlad Harchev
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML... Mike Nordell
- FINAL PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 Frodo Looijaard
- commit -- PATCHES: Compilation with LIBXML2 Aaron Lehmann
- Re: PATCH: Compilation with LIBXML2 was broken Dom Lachowicz
