On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:50:39AM +0100, Mike Nordell wrote:
> Commenting myself:
> > Doxygen complains because the function pointer in the
> > "(*)" is missing.
>
> Just to make this really clear. The (name of the) variable holding the
> function pointer is missing.
>
> I.e. it reads
> void (*)( /* #�%&/ */ );
> where Docygen expects
> void (*pfn)( /* #�%&/ */ );
Should we change this? Actually, would it break anything to change
this, since otherwise I think it's clear we should, since the latter
is significantly clearer.
sam th
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
GnuPG Key:
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/key
PGP signature
