At 08:59 PM 2/15/01 +0100, Jesper Skov wrote: >No, what it was needed for was cleaning up the mess of typeface codes >WP left behind when you edited text. Exactly. That's the problem. The "feature" should really have been called -- make it easier for me to delete the #$%^#^ you left cluttering up my document. >So if modern word processors leave the same kind of mess as WP did, >I'd argue that we actually do need the option - at least for the >control freaks :) Hypothetically, yes. But let's just do the Right Thing from the get-go -- never introduce that kind of mess in the first place, and we won't need to slap any hackish makeup on the warts. Paul
- Zero-length Runs and show codes Jesper Skov
- Re: Zero-length Runs and show codes Randy Kramer
- Re: Zero-length Runs and show codes Jesper Skov
- Re: Zero-length Runs and show codes Randy Kramer
- Reveal codes (was Re: Zero-length Runs and show c... Paul Rohr
- Re: Reveal codes (was Re: Zero-length Runs an... Randy Kramer
- Re: Reveal codes (was Re: Zero-length Run... Paul Rohr
- Re: Reveal codes (was Re: Zero-lengt... Jesper Skov
- Re: Reveal codes (was Re: Zero-l... Paul Rohr
- Re: Reveal codes (was Re: Ze... Ben Hall
- Re: Reveal codes (was Re: Ze... WJCarpenter
- Re: Reveal codes (was Re: Ze... Thomas Fletcher
- Re: Reveal codes (was Re: Zero-l... WJCarpenter
- Re: Zero-length Runs and show codes Paul Rohr
- Re: Zero-length Runs and show codes Randy Kramer
- Re: Zero-length Runs and show codes Paul Rohr
- Re: Zero-length Runs and show codes Thomas Fletcher
- Re: Zero-length Runs and show codes Mike Nordell
