>Likewise, if es-ES is missing, you may be willing to make do with either >another es-* (we don't have any yet), or perhaps another *-ES (we have two >of those). Still, chances are that you *really* want es-ES. Not necessarily. If es-ES is missing, you would be far more likely to understand pt-PT than eu-ES. phma
- Locale choice Tim Allen
- Re: Locale choice Paul Rohr
- Re: Locale choice Pierre Abbat
- Re: Locale choice Tim Allen
- Re: Locale choice Paul Rohr
