>Likewise, if es-ES is missing, you may be willing to make do with either 
>another es-* (we don't have any yet), or perhaps another *-ES (we have two 
>of those).  Still, chances are that you *really* want es-ES.  

Not necessarily. If es-ES is missing, you would be far more likely to
understand pt-PT than eu-ES.

phma

Reply via email to