According to Sam TH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, moving this stuff to XP code is an excellent idea.  There's just
> one potential problem, which I am not sure if we need to worry about.
> If moving these functions to XP code would require RTTI (real time
> type identification) then that would be bad, since RTTI is not
> particularly well supported by compilers, and can be significantly
> slower.  But again, I'll have to dig through my copy of Stroustrup to
> figure this out.  

I don't see where we need RTTI now.


Hub

Reply via email to