[ If you don't grok qmail or Postfix, then feel free to skip this message. ] Argh! The following message just arrived at the list a full 26 hours after I sent it. Something is grossly wrong, and I'm trying to isolate the problem. My understanding of email headers is pretty limited, but if I'm reading this right, a qmail process at my ISP took over a day to hand the message off to the Postfix process at AbiSource, which then sent it out 2 seconds later. Is there enough information here to help diagnose which end might be having the trouble? Any suggestions would be welcome. Thanks, Paul >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Received: by parsons.abisource.com (Postfix) > id 0ABBE13B962; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:27:35 -0600 (CST) >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Received: by parsons.abisource.com (Postfix, from userid 30) > id EC2EA13B963; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:27:34 -0600 (CST) >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Received: from smtp04.mail.onemain.com (SMTP-OUT003.ONEMAIN.COM [63.208.208.73]) > by parsons.abisource.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E3BA513B962 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:27:33 -0600 (CST) >Received: (qmail 8113 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2001 21:22:38 -0000 >Received: from 209-162-49-151.thegrid.net (HELO klee) ([209.162.49.151]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > by smtp04.mail.onemain.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 6 Mar 2001 21:22:38 -0000 >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) >Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 13:30:11 -0800 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (WJCarpenter), > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AbiWord Mailing List) >From: Paul Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] : Fix for "Ignore All" Spell Dialog (Unix) >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk > >At 12:55 PM 3/6/01 -0800, WJCarpenter wrote: >>My understanding/intuition matches Dom's. > >Ditto. > >>Further, "Ignore" is probably only good for a single pass of the >>"bulk" spell-checker. It doesn't appear on the right-click context >>menu. I think it would be cool to have "Ignore" persist (and thus be >>a good candidate for the context menu), but I think that is a >>moderately hard problem since "a word" is only a vague concept in the >>Abi code base. > >Yep. I briefly toyed with the notion of hacking in a character-level >"ignore" property and explicitly tagging the word, but just couldn't stomach >the thought. The editing operations alone would be ... unpleasant. > >>"Ignore All" is good forever and does appear on the context menu. >>(Well, "forever" means until you exit AbiWord, but that will change to >>persistent behavior someday as soon as I get off my butt and >>clean-up/check-in the changes for that.) > >Sweet. I ran out of time to do so myself, but this could be as easy as just >replicating the custom.dic logic with the following two variations, no? > > - it loads to/from a different hashtable > - it persists into the header of the file format > >If so, that shouldn't be bad. Do all our prefs dialogs have an appropriate >button which could be hooked up to flush this list? > >Paul > > >
