Re: UT_String

[Mike Nordell]

Joaquín Cuenca Abela wrote:
> (now, Mike, if you still think that char& operator[] with the
> implementation that I explain in this email is broken, a hack, etc. we
> can start a discussion)

It'll work in this new implementation. If it indeed fits a need (i.e. anyone
needs write access to the strings individual characters), the UT_ASSERT will
take care of the errors.

Thanks for the explanation.

/Mike