Re: some comments about our C++ code...

[Joaqu�n Cuenca Abela]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Does someone have some good references on C++ coding standards /
> paradigms? Singleton and other funky words I've seen fly by the last
> couple of days don't mean much to me.

c++ links:

www.cuj.com
www.gotw.ca

OOD links:

www.laputan.org/drc/drc.html

(in general, at www.laputan.org you will find a lot of good links)

If you don't have the design patterns book (E. Gamma et al.) (which is
*ABSOLUTELY* a must), search with google:
singleton,
factory,
template,
strategie,
decorator,
flyweight,
visitor,
abstract factory,
facade,
chain of responsability,
mediator

there are more, but these are imo the most important ones.

You should now a bit of uml to understand the diagrams.

Cheers,

--
Joaquín Cuenca Abela
[EMAIL PROTECTED]