Paul Rohr wrote: > I really like the idea of having a keyboard-driven ALT+ mechanism to input > arbitrary characters, but rather than stick to Windows-specific codepage > conventions, wouldn't we want to somehow specify *Unicode* characters as the > alternative to ANSI? I think that's the job of any IME, or do you from the top of your head remember the decimal representation of e.g 0xe000 (start of user defined chars I think)? :-) > Just a thought. In any event, I'd happily give up the existing ALT+1,2,3 > keybindings if that's what's needed to get a mechanism like this implemented > in a clean XP fashion. I think they can coexist. Windows (or rather, the IBM-"compatible" x86 PC, it's a BIOS thingie I think) only allow this numeric input using the numeric keypad. /Mike
- Patch: Win32 IME support Andrew Dunbar
- Re: Patch: Win32 IME support jskov
- Re: Patch: Win32 IME support Vlad Harchev
- Re: Patch: Win32 IME support Andrew Dunbar
- Re: Patch: Win32 IME support Mike Nordell
- Re: Patch: Win32 IME support Andrew Dunbar
- keyboard input of arbitrary character... Paul Rohr
- Re: keyboard input of arbitrary ... Karl Ove Hufthammer
- Re: keyboard input of arbitrary ... Mike Nordell
- Re: keyboard input of arbitr... Paul Rohr
- Re: keyboard input of ar... Mike Nordell
- Re: keyboard input of ar... Paul Rohr
- Re: keyboard input of ar... Mike Nordell
- Re: keyboard input of ar... Sam TH
- Re: keyboard input of ar... Martin Sevior
- Re: keyboard input of ar... Karl Ove Hufthammer
- Re: keyboard input of ar... Jesper Skov
- Re: keyboard input of ar... Paul Rohr
- Re: keyboard input of ar... Aaron Lehmann
