On 04/20/01 Hubert Figuiere wrote: > > Word does put them *inside* the file, but that is not a wise decision (although at >first it may seem). > > Word as other problem like not being really smart with file > size and likes keeping BMP as BMP, even not compress. I think > it is wrong, but we can't fix this. What we should fix is this, instead: try to insert an image and delete it from the document. Save the (empty) document and you will find the image data there. Repeat a few times and the document will grow to some MBs quickly. Note also that if you insert the same image twice it gets in the document twice, this is bad, if the data is the same it should be stored only once. lupus -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian/rules [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monkeys do it better
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Graphic Images Sam TH
- Re: Graphic Images James Montgomerie
- Re: Graphic Images WJCarpenter
- Re: Graphic Images Sam TH
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Re: Graphic Images Hubert Figuiere
- Re: Graphic Images Dom Lachowicz
- Inline Images??? [ was: Re: Graphic Images ] rms
- Re: Inline Images??? [ was: Re: Graphic Images ... Hubert Figuiere
- refcounting images (was Re: Inline Images??... Paolo Molaro
- refcounting images (was Re: Inline Imag... Paul Rohr
- Re: refcounting images (was Re: In... Paolo Molaro
- Re: refcounting images (was Re... Pierre Abbat
- Re: refcounting images (was Re... Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: refcounting images Paul Rohr
- Re: refcounting images Paul Rohr
- Re: Inline Images??? [ was: Re: Graphic... Alan
- Re: Inline Images??? [ was: Re: Graphic Ima... rms
- Re: Inline Images??? [ was: Re: Graphic Ima... Larry Kollar
- Re: Inline Images??? [ was: Re: Graphic... Hubert Figuiere
