On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 01:49:55PM -0700, WJCarpenter wrote:
> jesper> I just wanted to have an "official" poll on my suggestion for
> jesper> the alternative versioning scheme. Go read my posting on that:
> jesper> http://www.abisource.com/mailinglists/abiword-dev/01/April/1264.html
> jesper> But substitute the next version with 2 instead of 42 as in the
> jesper> mail.
> I agree with the proposal for simple integer release numbers.
t's different in
Release 43 pre 1
Release 43 pre 2
Release 43 pre 3
Release 43 pre 4
... whatever it takes...
Release 43
Release 43 Build 2
Release 43 Build 3
...
????
And
0.7.X
0.7.X+n...
whatever it takes...
0.8.0 (release marked as stable beta by the 0 and the even number 8)
0.8.1 (bug fix for bet 0.8)
Here's the cue:
Although simpler to use, the first case ONLY shows a prograssive development.
The usual numbering scheme shows progressive developement AND release status.
Also, please sign the releases, it's not hard, and very important.
Hugs, rms
PGP signature
