[ap/xap stuff discussed]
What I wanted to do was to add this to an ap_App baseclass. Seeing as how
there is none (and I wanted to get every platform working with 1 LOC) I
added this to xap_App. It's wrong, I admit as such. I did ask about it,
though, and here are my thoughts:
an IE_Imp or IE_Exp structure has the potential of being completely generic,
and thus can live as an interface/abstract class. All my code does is call:
IE_Imp::init(); IE_Exp:init();
and that's all. Now, my argument is that we should have something like this:
af/xap/xp/IE_Imp and wp/ap/xp/abi_IE_Imp which is a subclass. So now we can
do something like the following maybe:
IE_Imp::instance().init();
Just a thought. If you want this out of xap-land, please add those 2 lines
and the 1 #include to each ap_XXXApp's initialize function. I'm loathe to do
it myself.
Dom
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
