Hi Paul,

>Is that UI where you also got the idea for standalone Import/Export menus?

No, a user specifically asked for them, and told me that maybe WP or 
FrameMaker had them. I seemed to remember something like that, and it made 
sense to me to have these entries, and I think that it still makes sense to 
have at least the export menu item.

>It looks like the main differences here from Word's File/New UI are:
>
>   - no previews
>   - the normal.dot equivalent has its own radio button
>   - another dialog to choose additional documents
>   - no way to specify the document/template distinction

I'm not sure what version of word you're talking about here... Word1 maybe? 
Word2000 and XP (and, AFAIK, Word97) have a dialog which:

- has previews and wizards in one frame.
- has no normal.dot equavalent (the do have a "Blank Document" Preview, 
though)
- no other dialogs to choose additional documents
- a radio-button to specify the document/template distinction

I can include a screenshot of Word2000's dialog if you'd like.

>A.  File/New ... brings up a template-oriented dialog, which defaults to
>creation of a normal new document, if you just hit OK.  (Note that Ctrl-N
>and the toolbar button both skip showing the dialog at all -- you just get 
>a
>normal new document.)  It also allows you the following two options:

This is what our file->new does. Ctrl-N and the "New" toolbar icon still 
create a new blank document.

>B.  File/Open ... brings up a file selector dialog, where you can choose 
>any
>file to open that we know how to import.  IIRC, opening a template file 
>here
>allows you to edit it.

Yup. We do that too. Templates are pretty much just normal documents, after 
all.

>C.  File/Save ... either just does it, warns you, and/or triggers the
>File/Save As dialog (whichever is appropriate).

Yup, we have this too. So far, we're looking sorta spiffy!

>D.  File/Save As ... brings up a file selector dialog, where you can choose
>the file name and save it as any file type we know how to export.  If you
>opened an existing file, this should default to the same file name and type
>as it started out as.  If this is a new file, it should default to either 
>an
>AbiWord document (.abw) or an AbiWord template (.awt), depending on which
>you chose in the File/New dialog.

Ok, we don't make a distinction with templates here.

>To implement all of this, we'd just need to add a trivial new file type, 
>and
>an XP dialog for #A (which you've already started on, I assume, although I
>couldn't find anything in abi/shots).

That directory, much like the ui feature matrix or most of the help files, 
hasn't been updated in eons.

> >>1.  Personalization.  By changing your own copy of normal.dot, you can
> >>change the default look of all new documents you create, thereby 
>avoiding
> >>lots of UI complexities for changing the default font-size, paragraph
> >>spacing, etc.

Yup.

>Exactly.  I'd *love* it if we could migrate all the hardwired stuff here.
>Two quibbles, though:
>
>   - There shouldn't be *any* explicit props on that empty p.
>     All default properties belong in the style definitions instead.

Right, I was just offering as an example.

>   - What do we do if we can't locate any normal.dot file to bootstrap the
>     process?  I've been assuming that we'd still need a hardwired set, but
>     we could just refuse to launch, I guess.

I guess that we could:

1) Fall back onto our defaults
2) "WTF? How did this happen? You actually overrode the read-only 
permissions in the AbiSuite directory? MS Explorer told you not to view the 
contents of this folder, and not to delete the read-only file. You're a 
dumbass. AbiWord is broken and it's completely your fault. Learn to deal."

I'm clearnly in favor of #2, with this exact error message. Seriously.

>Otherwise, we're in total agreement on this.  I think people would *love*
>the ability to customize the default look of their documents by just 
>editing
>a template file in AbiWord.  (That snazzy new Styles UI will come in mighty
>handy, no?)

Yup. I love it. And with the recent work on templates, it'd be a snap to do 
so, too.

>What do you think of the suggested File/New UI above?  I'd like to get by
>with less menu clutter here if we can.

File->Import maybe should go away with the new "New" dialog. File->export 
definitely shouldn't, because File->Export just allows one to save the 
contents of a document without changing the name of the document you're 
editing or overwriting that name. Very useful, and has nothing to do with 
templates.

>Of course we can choose *not* to do things this way, but I really like the
>idea of using AbiWord to take advantage of other products' templates.  In
>effect, *our* template feature shouldn't care which file format the 
>template
>was originally created in, because we'll eventually be able to read and
>write *anybody's* templates.

No, it shouldn't. And this isn't too hard to do, either. RTF or DOC 
templates would be easy. Want a quick way for abiword to get 1000 templates 
overnight? Import everything from MSFT word and ship it.

Dom
hoping that he's addressed the key points
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Reply via email to