Patrick Lam wrote:
> 
> This following patch seems to work, partially reverting a change by abela.
> 
> However, as I am no C++ expert and I'm not quite sure what the semantics
> of a const function are, I will not check in this change myself.  Could
> someone figure out why it seems to work?

I must lack sleep or something.  You're changes are good, please commit.

Cheers,

--
Joaquin Cuenca Abela
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to