On 1 Jun 2001, at 12:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:52:03AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > There has been *a lot of* discussion about the best fitting kind of
> > HTML (plain? which css? JavaScript or not?) cause of differing
> > browsers capabilities.
>
> Spit spec compliant xhtml, and it will display prperly in any xhtml compliant
>browser.
<ironic>Fortunately every browser out there is xhtml compliant and
every church secretary would be pleased to install an other browser
when he's looking for help.</ironic>
> We have more things to do than supporting crappy browser xhtml implementation.
That's totally right. Therefore it would be very nice if AW could be
it's own help file viewer.
> although it may not seem much of an important feature (and
> maybe it isn't) it's an insightfull one, imho.
Actually I'm thinking of implementing the hyperlink feature. But
before I start with it I would like to know whether such a feature is
wanted or not. I'm just asking because there has recently been a
long thread about calculation in AW...
> BTW, xhtml is backwards compliant with html.
I know.
regards,
Christian (off for a long weekend now :-)
