su 01 jul 2001 14:29:57, Andrew Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My understanding is that both are based on the standard
> western encodings but the glyphs have the symbols in place of
> many letters. I've attached unicode mapping files so somebody
> can use these to make code to use a unicode font when the
> symbol and dingbat fonts are not available.
Also note that any characters in symbol fonts *need* to be the
correct Unicode characters when exporting to XHTML and other XML
languages. See <URL:
http://ppewww.ph.gla.ac.uk/~flavell/charset/fontface-harmful.html
> for an explanation. (Mozilla displays this web page correctly. IE and Netscape do
>not.)
--
Karl Ove Hufthammer
